Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.

2012-01-19 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:13:05PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Charles Plessy writes: > > > I do not intend to push a document on which persons disagree, so please, > > if you think that there are serious problems with the current wording > > DEP 5, or if you found an important bug in its syn

Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.

2012-01-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy writes: > I do not intend to push a document on which persons disagree, so please, > if you think that there are serious problems with the current wording > DEP 5, or if you found an important bug in its syntax, report it to the > BTS. I reported what I think are problems with the

Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.

2012-01-18 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:13:34PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > > The above notwithstanding, we can probably learn from this thread that, > for the future, it would help to first announce "I'm about to mark > DEP-$x as ACCEPTED" and then doing that. I personally don't think it is > a big