Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 1998 at 01:38:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Enrique Zanardi writes ("Re: Release management - technical"):
> > > On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > ...
> > > > I think we ca
At 5:38 AM -0700 6/22/98, Ian Jackson wrote:
>David Engel writes ("Re: Release management - technical"):
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
>> >
>> > A. There are two possibili
On Mon, Jun 22, 1998 at 01:38:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Enrique Zanardi writes ("Re: Release management - technical"):
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> ...
> > > I think we can only do one of these. With hamm we're doi
! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
> Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Craig Sanders [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:17 PM
> > To: Ian Jackson
> &
On Mon, 22 Jun 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We should continue to have `long term goals', and I applaud people who
> work towards them, but we must be able to make a release even when
> they are not met. It is better to have a release now and goals later
> than no release now and goals later !
and
Enrique Zanardi writes ("Re: Release management - technical"):
> On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
> > I think we can only do one of these. With hamm we're doing the
> > latter; in the future I think we should do the former.
>
>
Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> I think that in order to make sense of what's being said here we need
> to step back a bit, and think about abstractions rather than
> implementation. Lots of people (myself included) have been posting
> rather detailed proposals.
>
> Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
>
> Incoming -> unstable -> unreleased -> stable
100% agree.
some times unstable is so stable, that many people use it. this is bad,
if it's stable, it should have been released.
some times unstable is absolutelyy not useable, and it breaks my system
(grep bug, bash bug, new xxx without new l
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
>
> A. There are two possibilities that I can see
> - Timely and good-quality releases, or
> - Releases which meet some predefined set of goals.
>
> I think we can only do one of these. With
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think that in order to make sense of what's being said here we need
> to step back a bit, and think about abstractions rather than
> implementation. Lots of people (myself included) have been posting
> rather detailed proposals.
>
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: We need to think about what kinds of thing need to happen to a package
: or to a distribution before we release it as `stable'.
Yes.
I find it impossible to completely divorce the conceptual model from any
reference to details of the present or any pro
I think that in order to make sense of what's being said here we need
to step back a bit, and think about abstractions rather than
implementation. Lots of people (myself included) have been posting
rather detailed proposals.
Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
A. There are two possibilities that
12 matches
Mail list logo
