On 2011-11-16 11:14, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes:
>
>> On 2011-11-05 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
>>> the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep".
>>> The intention
Niels Thykier writes:
> On 2011-11-05 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
>> the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep".
>> The intention is to finally solve issues like #619284 and the goal
>> is
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:18:36 +0100
Niels Thykier wrote:
> The reduced set is available thanks to some UDD queries. We are looking
> at ~500 packages (see attached dd-list if some of your packages are there).
> Thanks for considering,
> ~Niels
>
> [1] http://people.debian.org/~nthykier/rg-build
On 2011-11-05 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
> the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep".
> The intention is to finally solve issues like #619284 and the goal
> is related to #629385.
>
> [...]
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep".
The intention is to finally solve issues like #619284 and the goal
is related to #629385.
According to Linti
5 matches
Mail list logo