Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:18:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:32:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:00:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > There's certainly time to communicate with the Release Manager that > > > the package should n

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-18 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:32:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:00:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > There's certainly time to communicate with the Release Manager that > > the package should no longer be considered a removal candidate. > > The way to do that is to

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-18 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:00:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > There's certainly time to communicate with the Release Manager that > the package should no longer be considered a removal candidate. The way to do that is to fix all the release critical bugs filed against the package, and upload t

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-17 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:49:29PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > No, this points to a problem with the bug list as seen by the testing > scripts. update_excuses for gjdoc says > gjdoc (source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, > s390, sparc) is buggy! (1 > 0) > which

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 09:36:46AM +, Mark Howard wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:13:23AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > > The thing is that #215314 has tag: sid bacause it only applies to > > unstable version (upstream release is on its way and will close it). > > Version in testi

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-13 Thread Mark Howard
I think the distinction between sid RC bugs and all RC bugs was removed at some point, without telling us. Take a look at the gjdoc package - there are two RC bugs tagged sarge and one tagged sid, but the testing scripts are not upgrading the version in testing, even though it would close two rc bu

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > BugScan reporter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Package: chrony (debian/main) > > > Maintainer: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > [REMOVE] > > > 223134 [] chrony: FTBFS: Errors i

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-13 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z pią, 12-12-2003, godz. 07:30, BugScan reporter pisze: > Some bugs have an additional set of tags indicating they only apply > to a particular release: O for oldstable (potato), S for stable (woody), > T for testing (sarge) or U for unstable (sid). X indicates that the package > is not i

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 09:34:12PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > BugScan reporter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Package: chrony (debian/main) > > > Maintainer: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > [REMOVE] > > > 223134 [] chron

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-12 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > BugScan reporter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Package: chrony (debian/main) > > Maintainer: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [REMOVE] > > 223134 [] chrony: FTBFS: Errors in kernel headers > Why is chrony getting removed? AFAIU,

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

2003-12-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
BugScan reporter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: chrony (debian/main) > Maintainer: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [REMOVE] > 223134 [] chrony: FTBFS: Errors in kernel headers Why is chrony getting removed? > Package: defrag (debian/main) > Maintainer: Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL P