On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:16:58AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote on
debian-med list[1] but the discussion should be here on debian-devel
(Reply-To is set):
> > Once we are at the topic of web tools: I'm really waiting for an answer
> > from you why you think that mgltools fit in your categories Fr
Sven Mueller schrieb:
> Comming back to icedove, an example would be the calendar plugin (which
> is not in Debian as far as I know).
You're thinking of iceowl-extension I guess? Using it here and it's
definitely in Debian ;)
> Regards,
> Sven
Christoph
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key
Gunnar Wolf schrieb:
> James Westby dijo [Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100]:
>> I see it as an almost bi-directional relationship, but one that allows
>> you to add it to the package that "cares" about it more.
>
> I agree with your analysis. But, if this is the case, the treatment
> should b
James Westby dijo [Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100]:
> > Yet a package of a plugin should surely have a ‘Depends’ relationship to
> > the application package. Adding an ‘Enhances’ relationship seems
> > redundant in that case.
>
> No, there are plenty of packages which depend on another with
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26:24AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > How do you imagine a technical implementation of a 'Enhances' field?
> > Something
> > like 'apt::install-enhances'?
I do not *want* this personally - I just wanted to know if any tool
makes use of this field in some way.
> Th
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
> > be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main question was whether
> > there is a technical implementation of the *Enhances* field.
> Personally, I'd would never set eve
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:35:10AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>>>apt-get --include-suggest install
>>>
>> -o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
>
> Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
> be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main que
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:35:10AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> >apt-get --include-suggest install
> >
> -o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main question was whether
there is a
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I even failed to grep "man apt-get" for the string "suggests" so
> I think I can not do something like
>
>apt-get --include-suggest install
>
-o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> I see it as an almost bi-directional relationship, but one that allows
> you to add it to the package that "cares" about it more.
So the answers somehow draw a sketch about the concept behind the
Enhances field - but is it technically
James Westby writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Yet a package of a plugin should surely have a ‘Depends’
> > relationship to the application package. Adding an ‘Enhances’
> > relationship seems redundant in that case.
>
> No, there are plenty of packages which depend on another without
> enhancing t
Ben Finney wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>>> As I understand it, "A enhances B" has (more or less) the same
>>> effect as "B suggests A". Thus, the reverse Suggests relation would
>>> be redundant.
>> A plugin "enhances" the a
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > As I understand it, "A enhances B" has (more or less) the same
> > effect as "B suggests A". Thus, the reverse Suggests relation would
> > be redundant.
>
> A plugin "enhances" the application it works in
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:13:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > What exactly means "similar". Assume package foo enhances package bar.
> > Does this mean that in turn package bar should Suggest package foo or
> > is this conclus
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:13:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> What exactly means "similar". Assume package foo enhances package bar.
> Does this mean that in turn package bar should Suggest package foo or
> is this conclusion not really valid?
As I understand it, "A enhances B" has (more or le
Hi,
in the Debian Pure Blends effort we were wondering about relations of packages
and what an "Enhances" relation actually means. Debian Policy says:
`Enhances'
This field is similar to Suggests but works in the opposite
direction. It is used to declare that a package
16 matches
Mail list logo
