On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Luca Capello wrote:
> > Well, the wiki page has a "last change" date. The AM (or FD) will
> > notice that it's not up-to-date and they can ask you to update it.
>
> Thank you for the explanation.
>
> Last questions:
>
> - is there something like a template for an NM page?
N
Hello!
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:19:41 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Well, the wiki page has a "last change" date. The AM (or FD) will
> notice that it's not up-to-date and they can ask you to update it.
Thank you for the explanation.
Last questions:
- is there something like a template for an N
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Luca Capello wrote:
> I fear of the fact that my wiki page will be outdated, while my
> involvement in Debian not. Probably it's a specific problem of mine,
> as I try to be the most perfectionist I can and... without success.
>
> Obviously, as soon as the wiki page will be a
Hello!
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:48:36 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Luca Capello wrote:
>> I wouldn't measure an NM commitment WRT a wiki page, at least if
>> she/he doesn't want to deal mainly with web pages.
>
> Writing a wiki page is like writing a mail... you can cut & pas
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No [expletive deleted] way. Debian is a volunteer organization. This
> means that we don't get paid. Lots of the various kinds of work people
> do for debian are mind-bogglingly boring - one random thing that comes
> to mind is the work Frank Küster is
Scripsit "Rudi Cilibrasi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I wonder if the same could be applied to Debian? (note I am not a
> NM/DD yet) I think Debian has really taken off as a new nexus for open
> source and would expect if it were possible to make a money
> contribution to speed up the NM queue many wou
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Luca Capello wrote:
> > For 2.2, I'd recommend that NM's maintain a page about them on
> > wiki.d.org (my current applicant did that, and I found that rather
> > useful). In a glance you can see applicants that are not comited
> > enough.
>
> I wouldn't measure an NM commitmen
Hello!
As someone in the NM queue...
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:59:44 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> For 2.2, I'd recommend that NM's maintain a page about them on
> wiki.d.org (my current applicant did that, and I found that rather
> useful). In a glance you can see applicants that are not comited
Sorry, the message was intended for d-p, please do not follow up here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Marc and fellow Debian friends,
Thanks for this cogent and clear summary of the problem as you see it.
It reminds me a bit of the problem of scientific peer-review; for-pay
journals often ask people to donate their limitted time reviewing
other people's work. Although the journal profits, t
Hello,
my comments as someone planning to enter NM during the next couple of
month follow.
Overall I find your analysis enlightening. I agree with those points I
do not discuss here.
> 1.2.1 Add more people
[Marc argues that this is not a long solution]
I disagree here up to a certain point. I
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>
>> 2.1 Multiple advocates
>> --
>>
>
>
>> Ask for more than one advocate (at the moment, I'm thinking about
>> two). This should get the number of people advocated with a
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> 2.1 Multiple advocates
> --
> Ask for more than one advocate (at the moment, I'm thinking about
> two). This should get the number of people advocated with a "Errr,
> I met him, he seemed nice" down. At t
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 18:40, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
> I'd like to implement the proposals I made in (2.1) and (2.2) as fast
> as possible, especially applying the rules in (2.2) to people already
> in the queue waiting for an AM.
I agree both points are a good thing, and should be impleme
14 matches
Mail list logo
