Re: xxgdb should get pulled

1999-01-26 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 16:34:58 -0500, Daniel Martin wrote: [my rant deleted] > I have yet to learn how to navigate this area, and am often surprised > at how strongly an offhand comment is taken. Smilies might have helped. In this case, your comment really triggered me. I seldomly flame, but in

Re: xxgdb should get pulled

1999-01-22 Thread Daniel Martin
"J.H.M. Dassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 11:28:29 -0500, Daniel Martin wrote: > > Is my only other choice for a graphical debugger the "lesstif-induced > > segfault" ddd? > > Glad to see my work is appreciated. Perhaps this is where I need to point > you to the power

Re: xxgdb should get pulled

1999-01-22 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 11:28:29 -0500, Daniel Martin wrote: > Is my only other choice for a graphical debugger the "lesstif-induced > segfault" ddd? Glad to see my work is appreciated. Perhaps this is where I need to point you to the power of having the source? You could e.g. try fixing LessTif a