On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:18:32PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:37:10AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Would you mind sharing the -39 or deb-src with us?
>
> xv isn't distributable by me as I'm not the copyright holder. Whoever
> controls where the original -26 source liv
> Personally, *I* think that still fails the DFSG, as you can't convey
> the right to distribute, but what do I know?
Definitely this failes the DFSG. These packages will probably never enter
Debian again, but at least _we_ (at d-u.o) are explicitely _allowed_ to
redistribute them.
> Wow... yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/06 22:18, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:37:10AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Would you mind sharing the -39 or deb-src with us?
>
> xv isn't distributable by me as I'm not the copyright holder. Whoever
> controls where the
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:02:20PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> BTW, if you have a look at the 'debian/copyright' file you will notice
> that debian-unofficial.org is allowed to distribute those packages,
> although the source code has been modified.
Personally, *I* think that still fails the
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:37:10AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Would you mind sharing the -39 or deb-src with us?
xv isn't distributable by me as I'm not the copyright holder. Whoever
controls where the original -26 source lives may not be OK either, but
that's not for me to say.
--
Marc Wilso
Hi!
You might want to check my xv packages at
http://ftp-master.debian-unofficial.org/debian-archive/packages/xv/
They have the so-called 'jumbo patchset' applied and compile well with
gcc-4.0 (not tested with gcc-4.1 yet, but should compile, too).
The packages were compiled before the xorg tra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/06 23:25, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:57:28PM -0700, Jiri Klouda wrote:
>> I just wanted to ask when xv is going to be updated
>
> It isn't.
>
>> or do I need to compile from sources?
>
> You can use this to fetch the la
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:57:28PM -0700, Jiri Klouda wrote:
> I just wanted to ask when xv is going to be updated
It isn't.
> or do I need to compile from sources?
You can use this to fetch the last source package:
# unofficial xv source
deb-src http://debian.uni-essen.de/misc/local/ theo-phys
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Jiri Klouda wrote, Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:57 AM
> [...]
> > I just wanted to ask when xv is going to be updated or what is
> > holding it up or if someone has some suggestion how I could
> > upgrade and still get it working (some experimental xv package?)
> > or
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:20:30 +0200, Izak Burger wrote:
> >xv was removed from Debian over five years ago due to licensing issues, so
> >I'm afraid you're likely to have to rebuild it yourself against xorg in
> >order to make it work.
> Oh yes, I remember it now. It is an image viewer/manipulator
On 10/5/06, Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
xv was removed from Debian over five years ago due to licensing issues, so
I'm afraid you're likely to have to rebuild it yourself against xorg in
order to make it work.
Oh yes, I remember it now. It is an image viewer/manipulator isn't
it
Jiri Klouda wrote, Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:57 AM
[...]
> I just wanted to ask when xv is going to be updated or what is
> holding it up or if someone has some suggestion how I could
> upgrade and still get it working (some experimental xv package?)
> or do I need to compile from sources?
xv w
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
JK> I have etch on my computer and when I tried to upgrade to xorg,
JK> it conflicts with xv.
JK> I just wanted to ask when xv is going to be updated or what is
JK> holding it up or if someone has some suggestion how I could
JK> upgrade and still get it workin
13 matches
Mail list logo
