Re: xmcd

2005-12-18 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 the mental interface of adrian told: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 15:40:46 +0100 (+0100), Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 the mental interface of > > adrian told: > [snip] > > > Hi, sorry for not responding earlier, I've less and less time for > > > Debian stuff

Re: xmcd

2005-12-18 Thread adrian
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 15:40:46 +0100 (+0100), Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 the mental interface of > adrian told: [snip] > > Hi, sorry for not responding earlier, I've less and less time for > > Debian stuff as time goes by (busy). There are substantial changes > > upstream i

Re: xmcd

2005-12-18 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 the mental interface of adrian told: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:28:18 +0100 (+0100), Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 the mental interface of > > Matthew Palmer told: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:37:28PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > does

Re: xmcd

2005-12-18 Thread adrian
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:28:18 +0100 (+0100), Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 the mental interface of > Matthew Palmer told: > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:37:28PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > does one know why xmcd isn't upgraded since 31 of May in 2003? The > > > pa

Re: xmcd

2005-12-17 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 the mental interface of Matthew Palmer told: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:37:28PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > does one know why xmcd isn't upgraded since 31 of May in 2003? The > > package is neither orphaned nor up for adoption, which I would do > > then. > > Have yo

Re: xmcd

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:37:28PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > does one know why xmcd isn't upgraded since 31 of May in 2003? The > package is neither orphaned nor up for adoption, which I would do > then. Have you asked the maintainer, Adrian Bridgett? He's around (last made an upload les