Re: xfce package

2000-03-23 Thread Vincent Renardias
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 21:19:36 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > upstream source. I don't know if we should upload it to frozen or if we > > should remove xfce from potato and only upload the new version to woody as > > suggested in the bub repo

Re: xfce package

2000-03-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 10:54:15PM +0100, Fabrice Gautier écrivait: > XFCE 3 is very different from the xfce in potato. > [...] > > I think you should rename it xfce2 and it should stay in contrib, and > be orphaned (but there is no known bug, so doesn't really need a > maintener) at least while

Re: xfce package

2000-03-22 Thread Fabrice Gautier
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 09:19:36PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi everybody, > > the package xfce seems no more maintained by Kevin Donnelly, someone > should take it over. The maintainer seems MIA ... trivial bugs are > not corrected for more than 172 days. > > Anyone wants to take it over a

Re: xfce package

2000-03-22 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 21:19:36 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > upstream source. I don't know if we should upload it to frozen or if we > should remove xfce from potato and only upload the new version to woody as > suggested in the bub report #60258. I'd second that suggestion. Unlike the old ver