Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-16 Thread Luk Claes
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 05:26:41PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2007/10/16, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I guess I'm being a bit the advocate of the Devil here, but isn't that > > > as invasive of their privacy as having direct access to the MIA > > > database? :P XD > > > > > > > No, a m

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/10/2007): > Then, back to the original proposal, wouldn't it make sense to have a > public binary database stating if a person is MIA or not and just that > info? It might be quite useful to us, non-DDs, it won't invade > anyone's privacy and I don't think it wou

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-16 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2007/10/16, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I guess I'm being a bit the advocate of the Devil here, but isn't that > > as invasive of their privacy as having direct access to the MIA > > database? :P XD > > > > No, a mia-query contains private information, stuff like: "started a new job > pro

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:44:39 +0200, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > 2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: >> > Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA >> > (missing >> > in action) is available

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-16 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:44:39AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > > > Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA > > > (missing > > > in action) is available only for DDs?

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-16 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: >> > Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA >> > (missing >> > in action) >> >> It's unlikely to change. If you need to ma

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > > > Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA > > > (missing > > > in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-refer

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-16 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > > Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA (missing > > in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-reference.pdf tells to > > use mia-query for this (chapter 7

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-15 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA (missing > in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-reference.pdf tells to > use mia-query for this (chapter 7). But the command is on a Debian machine > which ca

Re: why MIA database restricted only for DDs

2007-10-15 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:15:27PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA (missing > in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-reference.pdf tells to > use mia-query for this (chapter 7). But the command is on a Debian ma