Re: watchdog

2011-04-17 Thread Bastian Blywis
> > Does it actually perform some kind of checks? What I got from the > > Watchdog itself? Yes, which ones depends on your configuration. > wd_keepalive only triggers the hardware watchdog. No, I meant wd_keepalive and not watchdog. > > documentation is that it only writes to /dev/watchdog period

Re: watchdog

2011-04-17 Thread Michael Meskes
> Does it actually perform some kind of checks? What I got from the Watchdog itself? Yes, which ones depends on your configuration. wd_keepalive only triggers the hardware watchdog. > documentation is that it only writes to /dev/watchdog periodically regardless > what happens. Thus "basic watch

Re: watchdog

2011-04-14 Thread Bastian Blywis
Thanks for the reply. > Why? Sorry, I'm not sure I actually understand what you're saying. wd_keepalive > is started to still have basic watchdog functionality without the additional > checks performed by the watchdog daemon. Does it actually perform some kind of checks? What I got from the doc

Re: watchdog

2011-04-14 Thread Michael Meskes
> 1) Is it really the desired behavior that wd_keepalive is started in > /etc/init.d/watchdog when the watchdog daemon is stopped? If the system shall Yes. > be kept from rebooting due to terminating the watchdog process, does it not > suffice to close /dev/watchdog as it is documented in the