Re: using testing/stable/unstable names with cdebootstrap

2007-10-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in >>> config/suites file ? >>> >>> Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid

Re: using testing/stable/unstable names with cdebootstrap

2007-10-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Monday 08 October 2007, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Does it matter anywhere? You can use testing as suite name on > invocation and it will see that testing currently is lenny and use > that. I think it does. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ my-pbuilder-unstable.sh create W: /home/rrs/.pbuilderrc does no

Re: using testing/stable/unstable names with cdebootstrap

2007-10-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:12:12AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in > config/suites file ? Yes. It needs to get the Release file before setting up the parts which needs to know the codename. The code which did that was removed

Re: using testing/stable/unstable names with cdebootstrap

2007-10-08 Thread Marvin Renich
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071008 05:46]: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in > > config/suites file ? > > > > Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid. > > > > Ritesh >

Re: using testing/stable/unstable names with cdebootstrap

2007-10-08 Thread Vincent Danjean
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in >> config/suites file ? >> >> Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid. >> >> Ritesh > > Does it matter anywhere? You can us

Re: using testing/stable/unstable names with cdebootstrap

2007-10-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in > config/suites file ? > > Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid. > > Ritesh Does it matter anywhere? You can use testing as suite name on invocation and it

Re: using testing/stable/unstable names with cdebootstrap

2007-10-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in > config/suites file ? > Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid. Code names are stable over time, but "testing" refers to a different distribution now than it did two