On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:31:02PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> You should fix your mail system not to send quoted-printable.
Urm, why?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You should fix your mail system not to send quoted-printable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 19 May 2007 00:23:08 +0200
David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> >On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:12:15AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >
> >> Good point. Thus it looks like there is no right way [...]
> >
> >How about maki
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:12:15AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Good point. Thus it looks like there is no right way [...]
How about making the use of "-k all" configurable?
The point I was trying to make before is that the deci
On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:25:09 +0200
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:51:46PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > That seems like a good idea... but what would be the default?
>
> Doesn't matter as there are already examples of both behavior so picking
> a random v
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:51:46PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> That seems like a good idea... but what would be the default?
Doesn't matter as there are already examples of both behavior so picking
a random value and flamdebating it later is fine. The important
thing is to make the behavior
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:41:41 +0200
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:12:15AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > Good point. Thus it looks like there is no right way [...]
>
> How about making the use of "-k all" configurable?
That seems like a good idea... bu
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:12:15AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Good point. Thus it looks like there is no right way [...]
How about making the use of "-k all" configurable?
Gabor
--
-
MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Resea
On Fri, 18 May 2007 01:18:01 +0200
David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:23:55AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >also sprach Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.15.2201 +0200]:
> >> Now what do people think is the best option? (And why?)
> >
> >I use -k all
> "David" == David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> True, but that won't help if two initramfs-tools using
David> packages have been updated since last boot and it also
David> requires the user to know that the backup exists and how to
David> tell grub to use it.
..
also sprach Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.18.0842 +0200]:
> Does that help you when you cannot boot anymore?
grub provides an interactive shell.
also sprach David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.18.0844 +0200]:
> True, but that won't help if two initramfs-tools using packages
On Fri, May 18, 2007 08:26, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.18.0118 +0200]:
>> The reason I didn't use it in cryptsetup's initramfs script was that
>> many people who have > 1 kernel use the second one as a fallback. In
>> case the updated version o
Am Freitag 18 Mai 2007 08:26 schrieb martin f krafft:
> also sprach David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.18.0118 +0200]:
> > The reason I didn't use it in cryptsetup's initramfs script was that
> > many people who have > 1 kernel use the second one as a fallback. In
> > case the updated vers
also sprach David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.18.0118 +0200]:
> The reason I didn't use it in cryptsetup's initramfs script was that
> many people who have > 1 kernel use the second one as a fallback. In
> case the updated version of the package which calls update-initramfs in
> its po
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:23:55AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.15.2201 +0200]:
Now what do people think is the best option? (And why?)
I use -k all in mdadm already. I could not find any reasons why that
would not be a good idea.
The re
also sprach Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.15.2201 +0200]:
> Now what do people think is the best option? (And why?)
I use -k all in mdadm already. I could not find any reasons why that
would not be a good idea.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`
> Hi,
>
> I maintain uswsusp. It is a package that relies on a binary on the
> initramfs that will start the resume process. This binary (and some
> other stuff) get installed via an update-initramfs call in the postinst.
> On some updates, the new binary that suspends the system is
> incompatib
17 matches
Mail list logo
