"Fabrizio" == Fabrizio Polacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> We could let the -dev versions of packages have diversions of the
>> libraries to unstripped versions, and have the runtime versions
>> have stripped versions.
Interesting idea. I can't say I'm completely c
brizio Polacco [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 1997 12:17 AM
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: unstripped stuff in /usr/lib
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > We could let the -dev versions of packages have diversions of the
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> We could let the -dev versions of packages have diversions of the
> libraries to unstripped versions, and have the runtime versions have
> stripped versions.
Since most of the times -dev packages are needed to compile only
(headers and the symlink from lib.so), I thin
From: Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Policy, section `3.3.2 Libraries' says that all shared libraries have to
> be stripped (unless they are part of a debugging package).
>
> I'm not sure if we should treat static libraries the same way, since some
> people might need the symbols for debu
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure if we should treat static libraries the same way, since
> some people might need the symbols for debugging. Could someone
> comment on that?
Static libraries should be stripped with --strip-debug. If you want
stuff with debug symbols p
On Wed, 10 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> There is quite a lot of unstripped libraries/object files in /usr/lib, is
> this against policy?
Policy, section `3.3.2 Libraries' says that all shared libraries have to
be stripped (unless they are part of a debugging package).
I'm not sure if we sh
6 matches
Mail list logo
