Re: udev vs fuse: Transport endpoint is not connected

2015-05-18 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 18, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Could a udev guru please comment on the (somewhat) famous issue > `Transport endpoint is not connected` happening when a udev rule tries > to mount fuse filesystem ? The only description I found of this issue I think that the fuse process is being killed. You

Re: udev vs fuse: Transport endpoint is not connected

2015-05-18 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 18 May 2015 15:10:56 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > 1. What is the actual issue of ``udev`` vs ``fuse`` > 2. What (if possible) is needed to make a *udev* rules mount a FUSE > filesystem (I do not really care for proper umount for now). I can only guess that: - mounting a file system with fu

Re: udev vs fuse: Transport endpoint is not connected

2015-05-18 Thread Alastair McKinstry
I have seen this issue outside of udev, for iRODS mounting filesystems via fuse; if there was a break in connectivity (network) the kernel driver would crash, and this problem would occur. On 18/05/2015 14:10, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote: >>

Re: udev vs fuse: Transport endpoint is not connected

2015-05-18 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday 18 May 2015 14:13:46 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> Could a udev guru please comment on the (somewhat) famous issue >> `Transport endpoint is not connected` happening when a udev rule tries >> to mount fuse filesystem ? The only des

Re: udev vs fuse: Transport endpoint is not connected

2015-05-18 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 18 May 2015 14:13:46 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Could a udev guru please comment on the (somewhat) famous issue > `Transport endpoint is not connected` happening when a udev rule tries > to mount fuse filesystem ? The only description I found of this issue > appear on archlinux wiki, it d