Re: two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade

2008-02-17 Thread Philippe Cloutier
So, what is the best practice to recompile kernel-modules on kernel-upgrades? The current best practice is definitely to rely on users' memory :S See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299727 for some discussion about this. A few hacky ideas were proposed. I don't expect to see a

Re: two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade

2008-02-17 Thread sean finney
On Sunday 17 February 2008 12:11:18 pm Franklin PIAT wrote: > On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 11:26 +0100, Patrick Scharrenberg wrote: > > So, what is the best practice to recompile kernel-modules on > > kernel-upgrades? > > > > Any thoughts? > > What about postinst_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf ? > manpage s

Re: two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade

2008-02-17 Thread Patrick Scharrenberg
Franklin PIAT schrieb: On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 11:26 +0100, Patrick Scharrenberg wrote: So, what is the best practice to recompile kernel-modules on kernel-upgrades? What about postinst_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf ? manpage say's "... A script to be executed during installation after all

Re: two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade

2008-02-17 Thread Franklin PIAT
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 11:26 +0100, Patrick Scharrenberg wrote: > So, what is the best practice to recompile kernel-modules on > kernel-upgrades? > Any thoughts? What about postinst_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf ? manpage say's "... A script to be executed during installation after all the symboli