Re: tracking OpenGL support for specific boards

2018-11-30 Thread bret curtis
> > Many of those chipsets you list, as I understand, have a mesa driver > > for them that support opengl and gles. > > Such as freedreno which supports A4XX series. https://mesamatrix.net/ > > > > Keep in mind, only the proprietary drivers seem to not support opengl > > while the hardware is perfe

Re: tracking OpenGL support for specific boards

2018-11-29 Thread Re4son
On 28/11/18 1:19 am, bret curtis wrote >> Great that you collected that dataset, and put it public. >> >> What would help further would be for such information having references >> to sources, and each information point be referencable (not only the >> dataset as a whole). >> > Isn't this alread

Re: tracking OpenGL support for specific boards

2018-11-27 Thread bret curtis
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:58 PM Stefan Monnier wrote: > > >> What would help further would be for such information having references > >> to sources, and each information point be referencable (not only the > >> dataset as a whole). > > Isn't this already done for us here? > > https://gpuinfo.org/

Re: tracking OpenGL support for specific boards

2018-11-27 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> What would help further would be for such information having references >> to sources, and each information point be referencable (not only the >> dataset as a whole). > Isn't this already done for us here? > https://gpuinfo.org/ I don't see any reference to sources. Also I see it as "Ubuntu" a

Re: tracking OpenGL support for specific boards

2018-11-27 Thread bret curtis
> > https://github.com/Re4son/kali-gemini-multistrap-config/raw/files/Arm64List.xls > > > > Any feedback, correction and addition that could benefit this discussion > > would be appreciated. > > Great that you collected that dataset, and put it public. > > What would help further would be for such

Re: tracking OpenGL support for specific boards

2018-11-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Re4son (2018-11-27 11:38:14) > On 2018-11-27 02:46 +, Wookey wrote: > > > > > > Well, that's at very least an interesting data point. So yes, they exist, > > > but > > > they are new and expensive. Can I assume that this means most of our > > > arm64 > > > users do not yet get to th