Re: svgalib-dummy again

1997-06-24 Thread Roman Hodek
> Has anyone considered writing a svgalib replacement that simply > translates svgalib calls into X Windows calls? This would allow > those of us with cards that are unsupported under svgalib to still > use svgalib programs, though admittedly at a speed penalty. I haven't yet thought of that :-),

Re: svgalib-dummy again

1997-06-24 Thread Roman Hodek
> Better method: Remove the version from svgalib1g shlibs (as the > other libc6 libraries have done). The version would be needed again > if a new upstream release of svgalib with an incompatible library > arrives, as this seems far from happening this would be a perfect > solution for svgalib, IM

Re: svgalib-dummy again

1997-06-23 Thread Ben Pfaff
Has anyone considered writing a svgalib replacement that simply translates svgalib calls into X Windows calls? This would allow those of us with cards that are unsupported under svgalib to still use svgalib programs, though admittedly at a speed penalty. (My S3 card doesn't work a

Re: svgalib-dummy again

1997-06-23 Thread joost witteveen
> On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote: > > > > So, what method do you prefer? Or do you have better ideas? How hard > > > would it be to implement versioned Provides: in dpkg? Or are there > > > other reasons not to implement it? Is solution 2) too kludgy? > > I strongly prefer method 1. I

Re: svgalib-dummy again

1997-06-23 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote: > > So, what method do you prefer? Or do you have better ideas? How hard > > would it be to implement versioned Provides: in dpkg? Or are there > > other reasons not to implement it? Is solution 2) too kludgy? > I strongly prefer method 1. I really think

Re: svgalib-dummy again

1997-06-23 Thread Roman Hodek
> > dpkg's current dependency mechanism doesn't allow it to be a > > substitute for svgalib, because that is a shared lib and so all > > dependencies on it are versioned dependencies (coming from the .shlibs > > file). > > Well, more to the point: when package foo "Depends" on a particular versio

Re: svgalib-dummy again

1997-06-23 Thread joost witteveen
> > Now that svgalib seems orphaned, allow me to come up with this topic > again... But first a brief summary of the history and the problems: Well, nearly orphaned. I finally got an answer from "Andy Mortimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who currently is the one interested in being the maintainer. I di