Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, then Debian 2.2 will be broken.
No. There are not many packages which quickly switched to
/usr/share/doc without the symlinks. The maintainers of these
packages quickly changed, so they are alive and the should be able to
add the symlink to their next
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Your example implies that doc-base's install-docs is at fault for
> creating files under either /usr/doc/HTML or /usr/share/doc/HTML
> instead of files in a single place, with a /usr/doc/HTML ->
> /usr/share/doc/HTML symlink. Am I correct? Or did I m
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > > This may work sometimes but not always -> hack.
> > ctte decided, that this has always to work. If it doesn't, this
> > is a bug in the package.
> I assume that I can't start filing bugs against the ~116 packages
> on my system (eg, libc6) tha
Your example implies that doc-base's install-docs is at fault for
creating files under either /usr/doc/HTML or /usr/share/doc/HTML
instead of files in a single place, with a /usr/doc/HTML ->
/usr/share/doc/HTML symlink. Am I correct? Or did I miss
something?
In that case, shouldn't the bug go
Sorry to interrupt the flamew^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdiscussion here, but I have a
quick question.
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 12:01:22PM +, Roland Rosenfeld was heard to say:
> > One again: they are *not* accessible via these symlinks!
>
> They are.
Well, maybe. (see below)
> > This may work someti
Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ROTFL, why should I change dhelp to support a broken file format?
Can you give a short summary where the doc-base format is broken?
Sorry, I didn't read debian-doc so I didn't know what the problem is.
> Please tell me what for do we need doc-base? We nee
Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RR> It is always a good idea to use a generic format which can
> RR> automatically converted to all useful formats instead of using
> RR> one special format.
> No, sorry, but this is wrong. Why should we convert files during the
> installation process? T
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > There were some rumors, that Apache would be able to handle both
> > directories as http://localhost/doc/ (use /usr/share/doc/ and
> > if the file/directory isn't available fall back to
> > /usr/doc/), but I don't know enough about Apache to realiz
Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> > > > P.S.: The latest dhelp 0.3.14 supports FHS *and* FSSTND :).
>
> > > I just installed it, but as far as I can see this doesn't
> > > integrate FHS and FSSTND in any way but creates two completely
> > > incompatible
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > > P.S.: The latest dhelp 0.3.14 supports FHS *and* FSSTND :).
> > I just installed it, but as far as I can see this doesn't
> > integrate FHS and FSSTND in any way but creates two completely
> > incompatible trees one next to the other. Now I can
Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > P.S.: The latest dhelp 0.3.14 supports FHS *and* FSSTND :).
>
> I just installed it, but as far as I can see this doesn't integrate
> FHS and FSSTND in any way but creates two completely incompatible
> trees one next to the
Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? What is the advantage of using doc-base?
You may want to read the documentation of doc-base...
It is always a good idea to use a generic format which can
automatically converted to all useful formats instead of using one
special format. doc-base give
From: "Martin Bialasinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: strange behavior of dh_dhelp
Date: 24 Sep 1999 09:31:49 +0200
> * "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joey> You are under the mistaken impression that dh_dhelp is a
> Joey&
Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> * "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joey> You are under the mistaken impression that dh_dhelp is a
> Joey> debhelper program. It's not. Don't use it.
>
> dh_installdocs uses doc-base, which in turn registers documents for
> dwww and dhelp. Thous it
* "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joey> You are under the mistaken impression that dh_dhelp is a
Joey> debhelper program. It's not. Don't use it.
dh_installdocs uses doc-base, which in turn registers documents for
dwww and dhelp. Thous it is a superset and should be used, no?
Ci
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: strange behavior of dh_dhelp
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:46:12 -0700
> Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Some debhelper scripts automatically generate appropriate
> > postinst/prerm etc. with "#DEBHELPER#" setting when one r
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Some debhelper scripts automatically generate appropriate
> postinst/prerm etc. with "#DEBHELPER#" setting when one run
> dh_installdeb.
You are under the mistaken impression that dh_dhelp is a debhelper program.
It's not. Don't use it.
> Is there any reason of this beha
17 matches
Mail list logo
