Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:08:08PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > Anyhow I was thinking at something more generic that only getting orig
>> > sources
>> I don't think a Debian diff.gz should contain arbitrary updates from
>> upstream.
>
> I didn't
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:08:08PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Anyhow I was thinking at something more generic that only getting orig
> > sources
> I don't think a Debian diff.gz should contain arbitrary updates from
> upstream.
I didn't imply that it should be some other kind of updates, but
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 05:34:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > I guess a lot of us have similar needs. What about defining a
>> > standardized debian/rules target which should take care of similar
>> > stuff?
>>
>> We already have that: get-orig
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 05:34:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > I guess a lot of us have similar needs. What about defining a
>> > standardized debian/rules target which should take care of similar
>> > stuff?
>>
>> We already have that: get-ori
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 05:34:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > I guess a lot of us have similar needs. What about defining a
> > standardized debian/rules target which should take care of similar
> > stuff?
>
> We already have that: get-orig-source.
Documented where?
Anyhow I was thinking a
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess a lot of us have similar needs. What about defining a
> standardized debian/rules target which should take care of similar
> stuff?
We already have that: get-orig-source.
If the upstream-provided contents change regularly, this should als
6 matches
Mail list logo
