Re: ssl/crypto

2005-11-24 Thread Jaakko Niemi
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:43:27PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > libgnutls-dev is a suitable substitute for libssl-dev when one wants > > libssl. > > > However, libssl-dev provides *two* libraries; the other is libcrypto. > > Is there a GPL-c

Re: ssl/crypto

2005-11-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:43:27PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> libgnutls-dev is a suitable substitute for libssl-dev when one wants >> libssl. > >> However, libssl-dev provides *two* libraries; the other is libcrypto. >> Is there a GPL-compat

Re: ssl/crypto

2005-11-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:43:27PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > libgnutls-dev is a suitable substitute for libssl-dev when one wants > libssl. > However, libssl-dev provides *two* libraries; the other is libcrypto. > Is there a GPL-compatible replacement for the latter? libgcrypt -- separ