Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts

2005-06-15 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > ?? ??, 14/06/2005 ?? 16:55 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo ??: > > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > > and architecture independent to data package. > > I consider some common

Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts

2005-06-14 Thread Joerg Friedrich
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo schrieb am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2005 um 18:02:06 +0200: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > > > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > > > and architecture independent to data package. > > > > I consider s

Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts

2005-06-14 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > > and architecture independent to data package. > > I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones > move manpage to binary pack

Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts

2005-06-14 Thread Sergey Fedoseev
В Втр, 14/06/2005 в 16:55 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo пишет: > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > and architecture independent to data package. I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones move manpage to binary package and o

Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts

2005-06-14 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:35:36PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > How exactly package should be splitted on data and binary parts? Which > files should be moved to binary package and which to the in data one? > > Any standart procedures/recommendations/suggestions? There's only one rule. Archite