On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:24:18AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
>
> Jesus> Indeed the latest version of CRM114 managed to eat my CPU,
> Jesus> but i downgraded to the previous one and everything went
> Jesus> back to more than fine.
>
> What version did you downgrade to?
In fact I cannot
> "Jesus" == Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> crm114 is not a spam filter. It's a classifier. You probably
>> didn't train it right. It needs two weeks of attention before
>> being useful.
Actually, despite the bad result just recently, crm114 seemed to be
pretty accur
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:09:14AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> Nope, but ITP'd.
And Rob promissed a version of dspam after debconf4 (well, i promissed many
other things, but reality bites)
> > I have had problems with crm114 being resource intensive. In fact,
> > I have had to disable it,
Hi martin!
You wrote:
> > I have had problems with crm114 being resource intensive. In fact,
> > I have had to disable it, postfix was timing out on deliveries...
> > e.g. checking
> > /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/examples/sample-nonspam.txt.gz took
> > approx 3 minutes. The result? SPAM.
>
> crm
also sprach Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.07.0049 +0200]:
> dspam doesn't appear to be in Debian sarge. Not sure about sid, my
> Internet connection is down at the moment.
Nope, but ITP'd.
Brian, I am impressed you sent this email over a downed Internet
connection! ;^>
> I have had prob
> "Jesus" == Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jesus> In such case 2.64 will become obsolete even faster than
Jesus> 2.20 did in woody, since it is obsoleted by 3.x. Having
Jesus> 2.64 which is only worth having for the bayessian methods
Jesus> is brainless since we hav
6 matches
Mail list logo
