Ian Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:45:16 -0700
> Ian Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So it seems that with the currently shipping versions of gzip (I tried
>> both "stable/updates" and "testing"), there is actually no way to
>> exactly replicate the compression pr
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:50:53AM -0700, Ian Bruce wrote:
> It turns out that the zlib1g-dev package contains a program called
> "minigzip" in source form. This is what's needed; "minigzip -9"
> reproduces exactly the compression used by dpkg-deb, unlike regular
> gzip.
This may not produce iden
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:45:16 -0700
Ian Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it seems that with the currently shipping versions of gzip (I tried
> both "stable/updates" and "testing"), there is actually no way to
> exactly replicate the compression produced by the standard package
> build system.
Followup to the other lists too...
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:15:21PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:45:16AM -0700, Ian Bruce wrote:
>
> > It appears that dpkg-deb does not exec gzip, and it's not dynamically
> > linked with anything except glibc. I suppose that it's static
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:45:16AM -0700, Ian Bruce wrote:
> It appears that dpkg-deb does not exec gzip, and it's not dynamically
> linked with anything except glibc. I suppose that it's statically linked
> against zlib1g or something like it. So the question is, how can the
> exact compression a
5 matches
Mail list logo