On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:32:16PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2012, at 03:06 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> >you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it?
>
> I think there are a lot of good reasons to do source-only uploads, even when
> you should be building loca
On Nov 23, 2012, at 03:06 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it?
I think there are a lot of good reasons to do source-only uploads, even when
you should be building locally for testing purposes.
* Reproducibility - buildds provide a more c
]] Gunnar Wolf
> Didier Raboud dijo [Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100]:
> > Actually, I like that way to put it as it leaves us with multiple ways
> > forward:
> >
> > * accept source-only;
> > * drop uploaded binaries;
>
> I would join this camp as well. Without the working knowledge of
On 11/24/2012 12:30 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I would join this camp as well. Without the working knowledge of being
> a DSA or buildd-admin, I cannot assure how much would this increase
> our workload, but it would probably just mean rebuilding for the most
> popular architectures (that is, AMD64 o
Didier Raboud dijo [Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100]:
> > > > I am asking why, when I had a reason to do so, was not able to do a
> > > > source-only upload.
> > > > Is this a feature of dak, or a policy enforcement?
> > >
> > > Both.
> >
> > I'd argue that it's a bug in both.
> >
> > BTW,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:06:22PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it?
How is that related to my question? Also, please don't top-post and dont
send me copies.
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> > On We
you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it?
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
> > What is yet unclear is if we want to build all (as in arch:any+all) or
> all (as
> > in arch:an
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
> What is yet unclear is if we want to build all (as in arch:any+all) or all
> (as
> in arch:any) packages on buildds.
Are there any reasons to not built arch:all on buildds aside from
technical problems?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.as
Le mercredi, 21 novembre 2012 20.59:02, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 20. November 2012, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > I am asking why, when I had a reason to do so, was not able to do a
> > > source-only upload.
> > > Is this a feature of dak, or a policy enforcement?
9 matches
Mail list logo
