Re: questions on ITP

2001-09-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote: > i am not yet an official maintainer, but i do already have an advocate > and sponsor (Colin - what's the status?) Back from "vacation" and I'll help you now. Tell me if there are any changes from the last iprelay stuff you sent me

Re: questions on ITP

2001-09-20 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:40:32 +0200 Martin F Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > however, in the mean time i am happily packaging along and submitting > ITP's to bugs.debian.org the proper way. However, not once has one of > these ITPs reached the debian-devel list. they have been confirmed, > b

Re: questions on ITP

2001-09-20 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Sep 20, Martin F Krafft wrote: > i am not yet an official maintainer, but i do already have an advocate > and sponsor (Colin - what's the status?) > > however, in the mean time i am happily packaging along and submitting > ITP's to bugs.debian.org the proper way. However, not once has one of >

Re: questions on ITP

2001-09-20 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote: > however, in the mean time i am happily packaging along and submitting > ITP's to bugs.debian.org the proper way. However, not once has one of > these ITPs reached the debian-devel list. they have been confirmed, > but they haven't b

Re: questions on ITP

2001-09-20 Thread Gergely Nagy
You can either Cc: debian devel, or add a X-Debbugs-Cc: header (works like Cc, but includes the bug# in the subject too). IIRC, it is documented somewhere in the doc-debian package. Cheers, -- Gergely Nagy \ mhp/|8] pgpWqyKFvBmI9.pgp Description: PGP signature