Re: question about build a package

2013-06-04 Thread Chris Knadle
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 13:40:56, Russ Allbery wrote: > Chris Knadle writes: > > On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 06:31:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >> That's not necessarily true as a result of it being a 1.0 format > >> package (there were ways to use quilt patches with the 1.0 format), but > >> it i

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Chris Knadle writes: > On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 06:31:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> That's not necessarily true as a result of it being a 1.0 format >> package (there were ways to use quilt patches with the 1.0 format), but >> it is certainly true in this case. > Huh. I don't think I knew quil

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-04 Thread Chris Knadle
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 06:31:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On 04-06-13 04:48, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Unfortunately no: the Postfix source package looks like it's in 1.0 > > format, so there aren't any quilt patches. > > That's not necessarily true as a result of it being a 1.0 format package >

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-04 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On 04-06-13 04:48, Chris Knadle wrote: > Unfortunately no: the Postfix source package looks like it's in 1.0 format, > so > there aren't any quilt patches. That's not necessarily true as a result of it being a 1.0 format package (there were ways to use quilt patches with the 1.0 format), but it

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-03 Thread Chris Knadle
On Monday, June 03, 2013 09:11:46, Pol Hallen wrote: > Hi all! This is my first post :-) > > I try to patch postfix and I want be sure that my procedure is correct :-) I'd say yes. > apt-get source postfix and I see: > > f 215552 Jun 3 13:35 postfix_2.7.1-1+squeeze1.diff.gz > f 1754 Jun 3 13:

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-03 Thread Chris Knadle
On Monday, June 03, 2013 09:55:06, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote: > Pol Hallen escribió: > > Hi all! This is my first post :-) > > > > I try to patch postfix and I want be sure that my procedure is correct > > :-) > > > > apt-get source postfix and I see: > > > > f 215552 Jun 3 13:35 postfi

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-03 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Hi Pol, Your question is more on-topic for the debian-mentors list. You might get more help there. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013060316

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-03 Thread Pol Hallen
> Your question is more on-topic for the debian-mentors list. You might get > more help there. ok! I'll subscribe, thanks! Pol -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-03 Thread Pol Hallen
> probably you should patch the package using "quilt". You have more > info here: http://wiki.debian.org/UsingQuilt and here > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/modify.en.html hello and thanks for your reply :-) I read about quilt. Do you know if there is some problem compile the pack

Re: question about build a package

2013-06-03 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)
Pol Hallen escribió: Hi all! This is my first post :-) I try to patch postfix and I want be sure that my procedure is correct :-) apt-get source postfix and I see: f 215552 Jun 3 13:35 postfix_2.7.1-1+squeeze1.diff.gz f 1754 Jun 3 13:35 postfix_2.7.1-1+squeeze1.dsc d 4096 Jun 3 13:35 pos