Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-20 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> it might be a good idea for make-kpkg to check whether the >> necessary files are present in the kernel tree (and warn loudly if >> they are not) when one tries to build modules. On the other hand I >> have no idea what would be involved in checking thi

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-19 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Henning Makholm [Fri, Feb 18 2005, 09:13:26PM]: > Given the tendency of people like me to just repeat the procedures > that worked for 2.4, it might be a good idea for make-kpkg to check > whether the necessary files are present in the kernel tree (and warn > loudly if they are not) wh

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-18 Thread Greg Folkert
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 20:35 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote: > Hi, > > (I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem > sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either). > > This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just > use the standard kerne

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-18 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So, basically, your saying that the right way to do this kind of > things is to use the corresponding kernel-headers package, and apt-get > tells me that I need as well kernel-kbuild to build "out-of-tree > kernel modules" which seems to be exactly what

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-18 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, (I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either). This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just use the standard kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7 package) but used kernel-source-2.6.10 with the .

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-17 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote: >> pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted. > i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module. IME, this message is typically seen when one complies a modu

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-17 Thread sean finney
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote: > pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted. i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module. i don't get this message if i use "m-a build pwc-source" or the appropriate --append-to-version flags with m

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-17 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, I confirm that the pwc driver works well. Only at boot time, I have the following messages: usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 Linux video capture interface: v1.00 pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted. pwc: Unknown symbol video_devdata pwc: Unkn

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-17 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:53:01PM -0500, sean finney wrote: > i've been using this new pwc driver for a while now and have not had > any problems with it, tested on i386 and amd64 boxen. The compiled source from saillard.org works fine here for my PowerPC system as well... (tested with 2.6.8 t