Scripsit Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> it might be a good idea for make-kpkg to check whether the
>> necessary files are present in the kernel tree (and warn loudly if
>> they are not) when one tries to build modules. On the other hand I
>> have no idea what would be involved in checking thi
#include
* Henning Makholm [Fri, Feb 18 2005, 09:13:26PM]:
> Given the tendency of people like me to just repeat the procedures
> that worked for 2.4, it might be a good idea for make-kpkg to check
> whether the necessary files are present in the kernel tree (and warn
> loudly if they are not) wh
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 20:35 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem
> sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either).
>
> This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just
> use the standard kerne
Scripsit Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, basically, your saying that the right way to do this kind of
> things is to use the corresponding kernel-headers package, and apt-get
> tells me that I need as well kernel-kbuild to build "out-of-tree
> kernel modules" which seems to be exactly what
Hi,
(I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem
sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either).
This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just
use the standard kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7 package) but used
kernel-source-2.6.10 with the .
Scripsit sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
>> pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
> i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module.
IME, this message is typically seen when one complies a modu
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module.
i don't get this message if i use "m-a build pwc-source" or the
appropriate --append-to-version flags with m
Hi,
I confirm that the pwc driver works well.
Only at boot time, I have the following messages:
usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
Linux video capture interface: v1.00
pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
pwc: Unknown symbol video_devdata
pwc: Unkn
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:53:01PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> i've been using this new pwc driver for a while now and have not had
> any problems with it, tested on i386 and amd64 boxen.
The compiled source from saillard.org works fine here for my PowerPC system
as well... (tested with 2.6.8 t
9 matches
Mail list logo