tabris wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Thanks for the info. As I wasn't able to find any other email adress or
>> activity from the maintainer, I've orphaned the package and it will be
>> listed within the orphaned packages on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
>> soon. So you could either adopt it
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Thanks for the info. As I wasn't able to find any other email adress or
> activity from the maintainer, I've orphaned the package and it will be
> listed within the orphaned packages on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
> soon. So you could either adopt it and take care of it
tabris wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
So who do I need to contact to find a debian package maintainer for a)
procinfo-18 b) procinfo-ng ?
>>
>> did you try to contact the maintainer of procinfo? If they're not
>> interested, look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
>>
>
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
So who do I need to contact to find a debian package maintainer for a)
procinfo-18 b) procinfo-ng ?
did you try to contact the maintainer of procinfo? If they're not
interested, look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Yes, I tried to contact the maintainer. t
>> So who do I need to contact to find a debian package maintainer for a)
>> procinfo-18 b) procinfo-ng ?
did you try to contact the maintainer of procinfo? If they're not
interested, look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Develop
tabris wrote:
it appears that neocalderon.net is now a squatter domain.
Meanwhile, I'm unsure who to contact regarding a replacement for
procinfo that I started last year, procinfo-ng.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/procinfo-ng/
Basically the goals included a) fixing all the 32bit/64bit proble
6 matches
Mail list logo
