Re: problems with binary NMU and apt

2001-09-15 Thread Joey Hess
Simon Richter wrote: > Hrm, I just tried to build a package using > > DH_OPTIONS=--dpkg-gencontrol-params=-v0.1-1.0.1 dpkg-buildpackage -B > > In principle this could work, however current debhelper treats > --dpkg-gencontrol-params as equivalent to -u in > Debian::Debhelper::Dh_Getopt, so the -v

Re: problems with binary NMU and apt

2001-09-15 Thread Simon Richter
Package: debhelper Version: 3.0.44 Severity: normal On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Most of the esound packages have a 'esound-common (>= ${Source-Version})' > > dependency in debian/control. Is there any generic solution for the problem? > You could manually tweak debian/substvar

Re: problems with binary NMU and apt

2001-09-15 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:41:21AM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote: > On Saturday 15 September 2001 07:29, you wrote: > > In my case it's esound-common, which in turn makes the entire gnome tree > > not installable. > > Most of the esound packages have a 'esound-common (>= ${Source-Version})' > depende

Re: problems with binary NMU and apt

2001-09-15 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Saturday 15 September 2001 07:29, you wrote: > In my case it's esound-common, which in turn makes the entire gnome tree > not installable. Most of the esound packages have a 'esound-common (>= ${Source-Version})' dependency in debian/control. Is there any generic solution for the problem? Reg

Re: problems with binary NMU and apt

2001-09-15 Thread Gerhard Tonn
>Which packages are these? It's probably a bug in the package source, in >that it's coded in such a way that bin-nmu's aren't possible. There're >a bunch of packages like that. (ie, a Depends: otherpkg (= myver) line) In my case it's esound-common, which in turn makes the entire gnome tree not i

Re: problems with binary NMU and apt

2001-09-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 02:58:30AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Which packages are these? It's probably a bug in the package source, in > that it's coded in such a way that bin-nmu's aren't possible. There're > a bunch of packages like that. (ie, a Depends: otherpkg (= myver) line) This problem w

Re: problems with binary NMU and apt

2001-09-14 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:49:54PM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote: > I have done some binary NMUs for s390 in order to fix bugs caused by previous > compiler bugs. > I experience now the following problem: > The architecture dependent package created by the NMU have a 0.1 version, the > architecture