Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-08 Thread Bdale Garbee
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: : Personally, I have stopped using all the dselect methods in : favour of the apt method for dselect. Absolutely! We've put apt on every machine in sight, and it's amazing how much different dselect seems with apt-get layered between it and dpkg.

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-07 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> I think it's critical that we at least remove the horrid Ben> prompts asking you your block device for your CD-ROM, or at Ben> least make an intelligent guess and provide a default. There was a question in the local Linux

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-03 Thread Nils Rennebarth
On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 11:42:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Oh, I see. Well, that is even easier to fix ;-) A simple > search and replace should work, I think, from a perusal of the > script. Yes, but please may someone *do* it, and do it now! It's IMHO the only thing keeping me fr

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-03 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Johnie" == Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Johnie> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Manoj> Hi, When Hamm is released, then Hamm shall be stable. Having Manoj> stable hard coded is not such a horrendously bad idea (not Manoj> great, but not as disastrous

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-03 Thread Johnie Ingram
"Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Manoj> Hi, When Hamm is released, then Hamm shall be stable. Having Manoj> stable hard coded is not such a horrendously bad idea (not Manoj> great, but not as disastrous as may seem). Actually its a problem not because "stable" is hardcoded

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-03 Thread Brandon Mitchell
On 2 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Shell scripts should generally be mechanically transformable > to Perl, and I have had a look at this one, though not trivial, it is > certainly eminently doable. The question is, should we be doing it at > this late stage in the game? Well, if it

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-03 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Manoj> Umm. I don't know how to say this tactfully. I shall Manoj> try. It may be better, I think, in this and other tasks Manoj> (like modifying dpkg), that the new author be one able to Manoj> grok the original.

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-03 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: joost> /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/disk/setup is a shell script with joost> snippets of perl code incuded. IMHO it is not a bad idea to joost> write the whole script in perl, considering that it assumes joost> perl to be present anyway. Ben

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-03 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, When Hamm is released, then Hamm shall be stable. Having stable hard coded is not such a horrendously bad idea (not great, but not as disastrous as may seem). Personally, I have stopped using all the dselect methods in favour of the apt method for dselect. However, I unders

Re: problem with dselect and the "dists" hierarchy

1998-06-03 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "joost" == joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: joost> abstract: there might be a serious problem involving joost> dselect and hamm's new distribution format that threatens joost> to make Debian 2.0 cd's unusable. *snip* joost> /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/disk/setup is a shell scri