Manoj Srivastava writes:
> Error configuring $package: /usr/src/linux-$version does not seem to
> be a symbolic link, possibly from an old package or a left-over
> from a user installed kernel. Please remove
> /usr/src/linux-$version and try to reconfigure $package.
I suggest you
On Dec 20, Manoj Srivastava wrote
> > "Bart" == Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bart> Particularly if they happened to have a fully unpacked and
> Bart> configured kernel source tree in /usr/src/linux .
>
> Bart> * Poof *
>
> No it does not! Would you please look at what the
Hi,
>>"Karl" == Karl M Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Bart" == Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bart> Particularly if they happened to have a fully unpacked and
Bart> configured kernel source tree in /usr/src/linux .
Bart> * Poof *
No it does not! Would you please l
> "Bart" == Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bart> Particularly if they happened to have a fully unpacked and
Bart> configured kernel source tree in /usr/src/linux .
Bart> * Poof *
Perhaps the `kernel-headers' install script ought to look for an
existing /usr/src/linux
On Dec 19, Rob Browning wrote
> People who weren't using kernel-headers before (because they never
> needed it), may be in for a shock.
Particularly if they happened to have a fully unpacked and configured
kernel source tree in /usr/src/linux .
* Poof *
It's only a slight inconvenience, but
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I genrally unpack into /usr/src/local and mv things one level
> up, personally.
That seems reasonable. I guess I had just sort of always treated
/usr/src/ as if it was local, even though I probably shouldn't have.
> Rob> Now I'm happy to ju
Hi,
>>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> I recently installed the new libc6 experiental pacakges which
Rob> also wants you to install kernel-headers. The problem is that
Rob> kernel-headers thinks it "owns" /usr/src/linux. For users using
Rob> the kernel-package (or whatvever
7 matches
Mail list logo
