Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-10 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! Michael Banck [2004-10-09 12:25 +0200]: > But in the end, it depends on who does the work, so if Martin Pitt > (pmount author) should volunteer to integrate this into Debian, that > would be great I guess. It'll be my pleasure! :-) Of course I would prefer it if Debian and Ubuntu used the sam

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/09/2004 10:04 PM, alphac wrote: > I think hal + dbus-1 + fstab-sync works very well on debian, but the > real missing feature is the possibility for users to mount remote file > systems like cifs and smbfs without having root privileges or havi

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:04:10PM +0200, alphac wrote: > I think hal + dbus-1 + fstab-sync works very well on debian, but the > real missing feature is the possibility for users to mount remote file > systems like cifs and smbfs without having root privileges or having to > suidroot smbmnt, th

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread alphac
Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote: Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto: What is updtfstab? I use this on sarge/sid and w

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread Christoph Wiesen
Am Saturday, 9. October 2004 13:50 schrieb Sjoerd Simons: > But as you rightfully said, this is Sarge+1 stuff. So none of this will be done separately (faster) by the debian desktop team first? Is there still work beeing done to get the "desktop" branch up and running?

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:25:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:57:58PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote: > > Do we have a "debian solution" about this issue? Or we want to use > > updtfstab? > > What is updtfstab? > > HAL upstream has fstab-sync as fstab wrapper, which will

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:23:42PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote: > > > Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto: > > > > > > > What

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote: > > Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto: > > > > > What is updtfstab? > > I use this on sarge/sid and works very fine: > > http://ccomb.fre

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote: > Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto: > > > What is updtfstab? > I use this on sarge/sid and works very fine: > http://ccomb.free.fr/wiki/wakka.php?wiki=UsbMassStorageEnglish It seems this one just uses

Re: pmount vs updfstab

2004-10-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:57:58PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote: > Do we have a "debian solution" about this issue? Or we want to use > updtfstab? What is updtfstab? HAL upstream has fstab-sync as fstab wrapper, which will probably be used in RedHat's upcoming Fedora Core distribution, seeing how th