Hi,
On Dienstag, 21. Juli 2009, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> is there any chance to get that fixed by either removing the circular
> dependency from perl directly or by adding code to manage circular
> dependencies to piuparts?
as a first approach to this problem I plan to make piuparts ignore circular
Hey,
On 21/07/2009 James Vega wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM, James Vega wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> > >> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Hi James:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM, James Vega wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> >> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in
> >> our SVN repository (pkg-p
Hi James:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM, James Vega wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
>> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in
>> our SVN repository (pkg-perl) and display the logs, then it would give
>> us a nice to-do list of
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:44:07 -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> > But I have to admit that I run it very rarely because it takes way
> > too long (including the time to unpack pbuilder's base.tgz).
> In that case, using cowbuilder instead could work,
#389223
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in
> our SVN repository (pkg-perl) and display the logs, then it would give
> us a nice to-do list of things to look at.
http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/maintainer/p/pkg-
Jonathan Yu wrote:
> I'd like to see a feature to use cowbuilder's chroot instead, though I
> don't know of the technical challenges there. Certainly such a feature
> would make it easier to use and thus run more often.
That would be useful. It requires adding explicit support in piuparts
(with th
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:36 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:22:07 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
>> Largely due to the need of maintaining a full chroot just for its
>> use, I thought piuparts had too high of a barrier of
>> entry/maintenance to be used by everyone. Am I comp
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Lars Wirzenius [2009.07.21.1527 +0200]:
piuparts is _intended_ to be run by every uploader, actually. Or
at least that was my intention back when I wrote it.
Okay, that wasn't my impression, sorry for spreading FUD.
Largely due to the need of maintaining a
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:22:07 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Largely due to the need of maintaining a full chroot just for its
> use, I thought piuparts had too high of a barrier of
> entry/maintenance to be used by everyone. Am I completely wrong?
It can use pbuilder's chroot, and pbuilder --cre
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:22:07PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lars Wirzenius [2009.07.21.1527 +0200]:
> > piuparts is _intended_ to be run by every uploader, actually. Or
> > at least that was my intention back when I wrote it.
>
> Okay, that wasn't my impression, sorry for sprea
11 matches
Mail list logo
