>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brendan> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some
Brendan> modules which were previously stand-alone, any package
Brendan> declaring a versioned[0] dependency on:
Brendan> libcgi-perl,
Brendan> needs to either have
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:57:50PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > If those package are still going to be shipped separately (because
> > they're going to evolve outside the perl core), then they should stay
> > in the archive and perl must add Provides for them. Hence, the user
> > can still
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
>> previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
>> on:
>>
>> l
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi-5.
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:33:36PM -0700, Ryan Murray écrivait:
> while the build-depends on perl were updated, the build-depends for the
> new libdbi were not. You need to update all build-depends that might be
They were in 1.28-1.1 (NMU by Joey), but during the transition the
maintainer uploade
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 07:39:54PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea ?crivait:
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> > >make testing though, we
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:51:18PM -0400, Clint Adams écrivait:
> > Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
> > anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
>
> Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8;
> unfortunately the build-deps weren't upd
> Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
> anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8;
unfortunately the build-deps weren't updated, so it was autobuilt
inconsistently.
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> What happened to libdbi-perl ?
>
> Joey NMUed it in the pool, but it appears to not have been installed.
Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
--
see shy jo
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea écrivait:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi
Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account th
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those
> packages that were a
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> If they depend on those packages and perl (>= 5.8.0)?
If they have any sort of versioned dependency on provides (we should make a
list of those), actually.
But since this is a non-local check, and hard to write, I guess tailoring it
to detect dependenci
At 11:06 am, Sunday, August 25 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh mumbled:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
> > previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
> > on:
> >
> > libdi
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
> previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
> on:
>
> libdigest-md5-perl, libmime-base64-perl, libnet-perl,
> libtime-hires-perl, libstorab
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
>make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
>still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those
>packages that were alrea
16 matches
Mail list logo
