Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > If Priorities aren't going to be updated in a timely manner within > sid distribution, it might be time to rethink about its usefulness. Agreed. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > That said, I think it's good to use --resolve-deps by default for > testing/unstable, so that override changes aren't that urgent (they don't > break daily builds etc every other day), and can be batched up a bit, and > processed when the dependency graph is a bit stable. Which may very well

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Yes, I don't have --resolve-deps, in the hope that > > priorities are fixed by ftp-masters. > > > > There needs to be a decision somewhere: > > 1. ignore priorities and go back to what it was before > > and ma

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > AFAIK the plan is to not constantly bother the ftp masters with override > changes, Which makes the whole packages buggy according to the policy. Bastian -- A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect her.

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Yes, I don't have --resolve-deps, in the hope that > priorities are fixed by ftp-masters. > > There needs to be a decision somewhere: > 1. ignore priorities and go back to what it was before > and make --resolve-deps the default in debootstrap > 2. try to fix priorities/s

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-09-30 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > debootstrap test: > > [FAIL] create-sid-debootstrap > > [FAIL] build-sid-dsh > > [FAIL] pdebuild-sid-dsh > > [FAIL] pdebuild-internal-sid-dsh > > [FAIL] create-etch-debootstrap > > [FAIL] build-etch-dsh > > [FAIL] pdebuild-etch-dsh > > [FAIL] pdebuild-internal-etch-dsh > > [FAIL] update-et

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-09-30 Thread Joey Hess
Junichi Uekawa wrote: > debootstrap test: > [FAIL] create-sid-debootstrap > [FAIL] build-sid-dsh > [FAIL] pdebuild-sid-dsh > [FAIL] pdebuild-internal-sid-dsh > [FAIL] create-etch-debootstrap > [FAIL] build-etch-dsh > [FAIL] pdebuild-etch-dsh > [FAIL] pdebuild-internal-etch-dsh > [FAIL] update-etch-

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-09-29 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > > I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because > > I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere. > > It wasn't able to use this mirror with pbuilder+cdebo

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-09-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because > I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere. > It wasn't able to use this mirror with pbuilder+cdebootstrap because > cdebootstrap will see Release.g

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-09-29 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to > > cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine. > > > Not for me. > > I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because > I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere. > It wasn't able to use th

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-09-28 Thread Erik Schanze
Hello Junichi! Junichi Uekawa Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to > cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine. > Not for me. I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because I own a small modem line, but ca

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-21 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:48:31PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: >Hi, > >>>Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble >>>with your uploads :-) > >I'm looking for someone to upload the following packages > >canna_3.7p3-2_i386.changes: translation updates >d-shlibs_0.2

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-20 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble > > with your uploads :-) I'm looking for someone to upload the following packages canna_3.7p3-2_i386.changes: translation updates d-shlibs_0.26_i386.changes: error checking fix gamix_1.99.p14.debian1-3_i386.chan

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I'm looking for someone who can upload my jack0.100.0 transition packages; > care to sponsor? Uploading right now... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Re

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-19 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Thanks for sponsoring. > Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble > with your uploads :-) I'm looking for someone who can upload my jack0.100.0 transition packages; care to sponsor? They are available: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20050820-jacktran

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-16 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:46:16AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: >Hi, > >>>I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat >>>soonish. >>> >>>I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken, >>>and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing, >>

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > >I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat > >soonish. > > > >I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken, > >and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing, > >my new gpg key is not in the keyring yet. > > I'll sponsor all

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-16 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > I'll sponsor all your packages. Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble with your uploads :-) -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind t

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-15 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:51:25AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: >I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat >soonish. > >I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken, >and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing, >my new gpg key is

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > pbuilder CVS has a rough support for cdebootstrap; > it seems to be doing well, today it's not working > for me; maybe it could do better sometime. This morning I've tried again, and apparently it's doing something good. I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released s

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-12 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:36:47AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: >Patch in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314858 >seems to be required; please somebody NMU debootstrap. Done. Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-08-12 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I'm sending an update on how pbuilder/debootstrap is doing right now. pbuilder CVS has a rough support for cdebootstrap; it seems to be doing well, today it's not working for me; maybe it could do better sometime. Patch in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314858 seems to be

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-07-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Thanks for the comments. > Ideally there needs to be either > > * a login environment where changes are saved AND/OR > > * a hook that gets executed for an update operation, *before* apt-get > is called. Luckily, since pbuilder 0.118 which was released 31 Oct 2004, there is a --save-aft

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-07-14 Thread Henning Glawe
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:54:15AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > Ideally there needs to be either > > * a login environment where changes are saved AND/OR there is one: use pbuilder login --save-after-login (have been confronted with the same problem yesterday...) -- c u henning -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-07-14 Thread Brian May
> "Junichi" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Junichi> Hi, I'll just write a mail here to notify people using Junichi> pbuilder, that sid is a wild place. I recently had major dramas trying to create a sid chroot from a sarge system. So perhaps these issues have been fixed