Ben Pfaff writes:
> What I have heard is that `all rights reserved' is just a generic phrase
> used to secure copyright, it doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't a
> license that allows you to copy it.
"All rights reserved" was required by a long-obsolete copyright treaty. It
is meaningless u
"John W. Eaton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Do other Debian packages that are supposed to be released under the
terms of the GPL include `All rights reserved' in their copyright
notices? If so, can you tell me which ones?
What I have heard is that `all rights reserved' is just a generic
On 16-Oct-1998, Joao Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I agree with the enclosed copyright notice.
| Octave's author also has no objections.
|
| Please correct, if still possible, my e-mail address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > The files in the source distribution have no copyright notice, but by
Hi,
I agree with the enclosed copyright notice.
Octave's author also has no objections.
Please correct, if still possible, my e-mail address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
Joao
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Ola Joao,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
> "JC" == Joao Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 15-Oct-1998, Joao Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
|
| > Hurrying before the slink freeze, here is my intention to package:
| >
| > Package: octave-plplot
| > Version: 0.3-1
[...]
| > [This will be a great improvement for Octave, IMHO.]
| >
| > Actually, I
Ola Joao,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
> "JC" == Joao Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JC> I know nothing about copyrights, so I include none in the
JC> sources. My intention is that plplot_octave could be available
JC> in a future release of Octave, if Octave's author wants
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Hurrying before the slink freeze, here is my intention
to package:
===
Package: octave-plplot
Version: 0.3-1
Section: math
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.0.7u),
7 matches
Mail list logo
