On Sun, 2020-03-08 at 11:44 -0400, Marvin Renich wrote:
> * jnq...@gmail.com [200308 10:58]:
> > On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 21:30 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > > The problem is that installing the package will automatically
> > > start
> > > the
> > > daemon cluster in a "default" configuration.
> >
* jnq...@gmail.com [200308 10:58]:
> On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 21:30 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > The problem is that installing the package will automatically start
> > the
> > daemon cluster in a "default" configuration.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://askubuntu.com/questions/74061/install-packages-wit
On Sun, 2020-03-08 at 18:50 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> debootstrap's files don't contain the string "divert". They do,
> however, dump "exit 101" to $TARGET/usr/sbin/poliy-rc.d.
I should issue a small correction to my earlier statement of live-build
using a dpkg-divert of start-stop-daemon as its
On 07.03.20 21:30, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> tldr: why is not having a daemon started on install so involved? Can't
> there be a better way?
to which Jonas, Marco & jnqnfe replied (see thread). Thanks a lot Jonas,
Marco & jnqnfe!
*t
On Sun, 2020-03-08 at 18:50 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2020 14:58:01 +, jnq...@gmail.com wrote:
> > how live-build achieves this is essentially the same as happens to
> > be
> > discussed in the linked page for Debian's debootstrap package (the
> > tool
> > for building the base
On Sun, 08 Mar 2020 14:58:01 +, jnq...@gmail.com wrote:
>fyi, preventing start/stop of _all_ services on package installation is
>a requirement of Debian's live-build, which if you're not familiar with
>it is a tool to build a Debian live-cd. Building a live environment is
>typically done in a
On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 21:30 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> The problem is that installing the package will automatically start
> the
> daemon cluster in a "default" configuration.
>
> That's a problem for me because etcd differentiates between starting
> the
> cluster for the first time and starti
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 21:30:33 +0100, Tomas Pospisek
>When I duckduckgo "dpkg do not start service on install" first hit is
>[1] which contains /absurdly involved/ suggestions to achieve "not
>starting a daemon upon installation".
>
>[1]
>https://askubuntu.com/questions/74061/install-packages-without
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 23:02:23 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>There is:
>
># systemctl mask $DAEMON.service
># apt install $DAEMON
>
>That's it. If the package fails to install then file a bug.
For that you need to know how the $DAEMON is called.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Mar 07, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> tldr: why is not having a daemon started on install so involved? Can't
> there be a better way?
There is:
# systemctl mask $DAEMON.service
# apt install $DAEMON
That's it. If the package fails to install then file a bug.
> When I duckduckgo "dpkg do not start
Quoting Tomas Pospisek (2020-03-07 21:30:33)
> tldr: why is not having a daemon started on install so involved? Can't
> there be a better way?
> It /seems/ that the "official" way to achieve "not starting a daemon
> upon installation" is to use `dpkg-divert` to overwrite `policy-rc.d`
> with a
11 matches
Mail list logo
