Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

Hello A Mennucc, * A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-27 09:41]: > I had forgotten mplayer_1.0pre7.orig.tar.gz > > now it is there [...] any progress? regards nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

Le Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:30:06 +0200, Mario Fux a écrit : > Am Dienstag, 26. April 2005 01.29 schrieb Jeroen van Wolffelaar: > But what is the difference of mplayers encoding capabilities to ffmpegs > encoding capabilities (from it's description: "encoding formats (MPEG, DivX, > MPEG4, AC3, DV, .

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

David Nusinow wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 10270 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: The list used to be >200 packages long. It is now ~20 packages long. It was somewhere around 600. Showoff :-) (Thank you and the other ftpmasters for blasting throu

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

Le mercredi 27 avril 2005 à 10:17 +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit : > (if I recall, A52 decoding is > statically linked into xine, so it shouldn't be a problem to have > mplayer statically link and A52 decoder too). Xine isn't linked to the A52 decoder, see #301638. -- .''`. Josselin

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 12:59:36AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 08:30:06PM +0200, Mario Fux wrote: > > But what is the difference of mplayers encoding capabilities to ffmpegs > > encoding capabilities (from it's description: "encoding formats (MPEG, > > DivX, > >

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 08:30:06PM +0200, Mario Fux wrote: > But what is the difference of mplayers encoding capabilities to ffmpegs > encoding capabilities (from it's description: "encoding formats (MPEG, DivX, > MPEG4, AC3, DV, ...).") which is in unstable and testing? None that I know of, but

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

Am Dienstag, 26. April 2005 01.29 schrieb Jeroen van Wolffelaar: Morning Thanks for your explanations and don't take my mail as rant, it's just a question. > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:34:41PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > > mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at > > http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mpl

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

I had forgotten mplayer_1.0pre7.orig.tar.gz now it is there A Mennucc wrote: hi mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge a. ps: still no news from ftpmasters... hope they at least will try to read http://people.debian.org/~mjr/mplayer.html -- To UNSUBSC

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

A Mennucc wrote: > mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at > http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge If you are familiar with Christian Marillat's unofficial packages from , would you mind summarising the major differences between his package and yours? I'm just cur

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:34:41PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at > http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge > > a. > > ps: still no news from ftpmasters... hope they at least will try to read > http://people.debian.org/~mjr/mplayer.html Right, so as an mplay

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 10270 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > The list used to be >200 packages long. It is now ~20 packages long. > > It was somewhere around 600. Showoff :-) (Thank you and the other ftpmasters for blasting through the

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On 10270 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > The list used to be >200 packages long. It is now ~20 packages long. It was somewhere around 600. -- bye Joerg "Paris Hilton" is a woman? Not a hotel? This thread gets more surreal with every post... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:53:50PM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote: > * Russ Allbery [Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:47:13 -0700]: > > > it's more clear what's going on; some packages are sitting, but most > > things are being approved very quickly. mplayer (and hot-babe) are among > > the ones that are sitting.

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

* Russ Allbery [Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:47:13 -0700]: > it's more clear what's going on; some packages are sitting, but most > things are being approved very quickly. mplayer (and hot-babe) are among > the ones that are sitting. And as I learnt yesterday, some of the ones "sitting" are still there

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

Jeff Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FTP Assistants -- > member Randall Donald (NEW processing) > member Daniel Silverstone (NEW processing) > member Joerg Jaspert (NEW processing) > Am I correct in assuming "NEW processing" means this is what you guys > volunteered to handle

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

[Jeff Carr] > Did new packages stop getting processed because someone uploaded > that "hot-babe" package? You might find http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW-summary.html> slightly illuminating. From that list, I read that the NEW queue processing in general is progressing nicely, and that the

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

A Mennucc wrote: hi mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge a. ps: still no news from ftpmasters... hope they at least will try to read http://people.debian.org/~mjr/mplayer.html FTP Assistants -- member Randall Donald (NEW processing) member Dan