Re: memset(x,y,0) bug audit

2011-01-19 Thread Raphael Geissert
Samuel Thibault wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:11, Silvio Cesare > wrote: >> I performed an audit of Debian stable for memset(x,y,0) bugs. These >> should typically be corrected with memset(x,0,y). > > I guess that could be one of the candidates for DACA. Will be available once cppcheck 1.

Re: memset(x,y,0) bug audit

2011-01-18 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:32:22 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:11, Silvio Cesare wrote: >> I performed an audit of Debian stable for memset(x,y,0) bugs. These should >> typically be corrected with memset(x,0,y). >> >> The results can be found >> https://github.c

Re: memset(x,y,0) bug audit

2011-01-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:11, Silvio Cesare wrote: > I performed an audit of Debian stable for memset(x,y,0) bugs. These should > typically be corrected with memset(x,0,y). > > The results can be found > https://github.com/silviocesare/Automated-Audits/blob/master/Debian5.05/Memset0Count/06-01-20

Re: memset(x,y,0) bug audit

2011-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:11, Silvio Cesare wrote: > I performed an audit of Debian stable for memset(x,y,0) bugs. These should > typically be corrected with memset(x,0,y). > > The results can be found > https://github.com/silviocesare/Automated-Audits/blob/master/Debian5.05/Memset0Count/06-01-20