Re: md5 sum mismatches and mirror syncs

2006-08-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.11.2326 +0100]: >> The algorithm used is 2pass. First pass only mirrors pool while the >> second pass mirrors the Release and Packages files. The time a mirror >> is out of sync should alway

Re: md5 sum mismatches and mirror syncs

2006-08-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.11.2326 +0100]: > The algorithm used is 2pass. First pass only mirrors pool while the > second pass mirrors the Release and Packages files. The time a mirror > is out of sync should always be limited to the time it takes to > download th

Re: md5 sum mismatches and mirror syncs

2006-08-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Failed to fetch > http://ftp.ie.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz > MD5Sum mismatch > > I am seeing a lot of this stuff lately, and I've been told it's due > to mirror syncs. As our archive grows bigger, the sync takes longer, >

Re: md5 sum mismatches and mirror syncs

2006-08-11 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060811 13:22]: > Shouldn't we switch to using/advocating a smarter algorithm like > the one debmirror or anonftpsync use, which is to push new package > files to the archive, then synchronise indices, then delete obsolete > package files? We used someth

Re: md5 sum mismatches and mirror syncs

2006-08-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.11.1222 +0100]: > Shouldn't we switch to using/advocating a smarter algorithm like > the one debmirror or anonftpsync use, which is to push new package > files to the archive, then synchronise indices, then delete obsolete > package files? s