On Sun, Dec 17, 2006, David Weinehall wrote:
> Some entries seem to list newer Debian-versions than upstream
> versions... Some watch-files out of sync?
The list of GNOME versions is built from the 2.16 tarball repository,
but Debian might have cherry-picked some newer upstream releases, such
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 04:52:04PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> > > access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> > > why? Could someone rectify t
Luk Claes wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> > access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> > why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
>
> The updates have not been reactivated since the m
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
The updates have not been reactivated since the move of ftp-master.d.o AFAIK.
4 matches
Mail list logo