On Sun, Dec 17, 2006, David Weinehall wrote:
> Some entries seem to list newer Debian-versions than upstream
> versions... Some watch-files out of sync?
The list of GNOME versions is built from the 2.16 tarball repository,
but Debian might have cherry-picked some newer upstream releases, such
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 04:52:04PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> > > access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> > > why? Could someone rectify t
Luk Claes wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> > access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> > why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
>
> The updates have not been reactivated since the m
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
The updates have not been reactivated since the move of ftp-master.d.o AFAIK.
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It sounds like all you need is for dpkg-scanpackages or apt-ftparchive to
> optionally accept a list of filenames, instead of a list of directories.
> I think this would be a useful enhancement.
apt-ftparchive already does.
--
James
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 01:19:36PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > There's no need for a database unless you want to maintain multiple
> > distributions out of cross-sections of the pool, as Debian does.
>
> > Or is there a dif
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 01:19:36PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:15:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > madison requires connectivity to a Debian database which is not publicly
> > > accessible, s
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:59:51PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> > I think it can be useful for those who want to create their own flavour of
> > Debian or want to (partially) mirror Debian.
> > dpkg-scanpackages/apt-ftparchive
>
Previously Andrew Suffield wrote:
> However, the value of a package that would be used by about half a
> dozen people in total is probably not all that high.
We have packages that nobody uses. I wouldn't mind seeing the whole
archive management suite being packaged properly, and I think it
would
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:15:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > madison requires connectivity to a Debian database which is not publicly
> > accessible, so it is only useful on a couple of internal Debian
> > machines. For this
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> I think it can be useful for those who want to create their own flavour of
> Debian or want to (partially) mirror Debian. dpkg-scanpackages/apt-ftparchive
> doesn't work very well for packages which are located in the pool, and the
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:15:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
>
> > madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
> > search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to package
> > it?
>
>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
> search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to package
> it?
madison requires connectivity to a Debian database which is not publicly
acces
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
> search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to
> package it?
>
madison has to be run on ftp-master, thats why it is not packaged.
If you wan
14 matches
Mail list logo
