Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And it's now been accepted by katie, thanks to Joshua Kwan.
Many thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:39:34PM +1000, Rob Weir said
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:19:08AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG said
> >
> > lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
> > been rebuilt with the new versions. What is the current NMU policy
> > for such packages?
>
Edward J. Shornock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>The source is at http://crumbs.ertius.org/~rob/debian/lyx/, feel free to
>>upload it if you think it's ok.
> Wouldn't it be better to have the build depends like this?
> Build-Depends: libqt3-mt-dev (>=3:3.3.5), xlibs-dev (>> 4.3.
Rob Weir wrote:
The source is at http://crumbs.ertius.org/~rob/debian/lyx/, feel free to
upload it if you think it's ok.
Wouldn't it be better to have the build depends like this?
Build-Depends: libqt3-mt-dev (>=3:3.3.5), xlibs-dev (>> 4.3.0)
Xorg is in both Sid and Etch, and we don't wa
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:05:14PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh said
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:19:08AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
> > > been rebuilt with the new ve
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:11:05PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh said
> >From memory, lyx is a major mess that FTBFS with gcc4 in very horripilant
> ways, uses yada, and is otherwise NMU-unfriendly IMHO. But it has been some
> time since I tried to build it.
>
> It is also outdated (1.3.6 is
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 02:52:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG said
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
> >> been rebuilt with the new versions. What
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:19:08AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG said
>
> lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
> been rebuilt with the new versions. What is the current NMU policy
> for such packages?
Please don't NMU it, I'm the maintainer and tried to have it upload
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:09:23 18:11 -0300]:
> From memory, lyx is a major mess that FTBFS with gcc4 in very horripilant
> ways, uses yada, and is otherwise NMU-unfriendly IMHO. But it has been some
> time since I tried to build it.
The build system has been change
* Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:09:23 11:19 -0700]:
>
> lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
> been rebuilt with the new versions. What is the current NMU policy
> for such packages?
Hi Thomas,
AIUI, there are lyx packages ready, but there was a p
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:19:08AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
> > been rebuilt with the new versions. What is the current NMU policy
> > for such packages?
>
> I understand th
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:19:08AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
>> been rebuilt with the new versions. What is the current NMU policy
>> for such packages?
>
> I understand that
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Blech. The current team hasn't responded to my emails, but my complaint
> is that it has bugs marked "pending upload" for nearly two weeks now.
I mark bugs as pending when I've committed the patch to fix the bug to the
package repository (in fact
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:19:08AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
> been rebuilt with the new versions. What is the current NMU policy
> for such packages?
I understand that the maintainer (or most active uploader, whatever)
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
>> been rebuilt with the new versions. What is the current NMU policy
>> for such packages?
>
> At this point in time?
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> lyx is one of the lingering packages that uses libqt3-mt but hasn't
> been rebuilt with the new versions. What is the current NMU policy
> for such packages?
At this point in time? Do it if you are up to it, and it can even be 0-day
if you're sur
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 03:18:18PM -0500, Shaleh wrote:
> That allows it to live in contrib -- woopie. Until they have a non forms
> based
> GUI, it matters little.
But noone will ask for the removal of LyX anymore.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-St
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 03:18:18PM -0500, Shaleh wrote:
> > I just learned that the LyX copyright file was corrected to explicitely
> > state that linking against a non-free library is okay. This however wasn't
> > really needed as 'The law is quite clear that the release of the software by
> > the
On 29-Jan-99 Michael Meskes wrote:
> I just learned that the LyX copyright file was corrected to explicitely
> state that linking against a non-free library is okay. This however wasn't
> really needed as 'The law is quite clear that the release of the software by
> the original authors and copyri
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 04:38:45PM +0100, mummert&[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I might be able to get a similar license agreement for KDE as the one I
> send for LyX. Would that be enough to get at least major parts of KDE back
> on the site? I have no idea how much we would have to keep out. I know
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 03:56:39AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> I've made by the way a quick'n'dirty updated package of the current
> lyx-0.12.1pre8 which already contains this LaTeX importing feature.
> Seems to be working very well with the LaTeX files i tried out so far:
Good to hear that. :-)
I've made by the way a quick'n'dirty updated package of the current
lyx-0.12.1pre8 which already contains this LaTeX importing feature.
Seems to be working very well with the LaTeX files i tried out so far:
ftp://ietpd1.sowi.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/{binary,source}
If you'd like to you
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 11:11:24PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> They are preparing to release version 1.0 instead of another bugfix
> release 0.12.1 because LyX with all applied fixes has proven to be
> very stable and good enough. It will contain an import facility for
I see. And I agree, it real
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I am just, out of my inherent curiosity, curious whether LyX still exists
> in the hamm distribution.
> This was the only available word processor that came with Debian.
> I know that it is technically a "pain in the ",
> and that anyone who can type > 50WPM can b
On Sat, Jun 20, 1998 at 04:32:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My package database lists LyX in the "obsolete" category - IMO
> this is a shame. If it has disappeared from debian, I believe something
> *needs* to come up soon to replace it.
There's LyX and KLyX, a KDE version o
25 matches
Mail list logo
