Hi -devel (and -lsb),
Le mercredi, 4 avril 2012 11.35:49, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> I have recently uploaded lsb-base 4.1+Debian0+fancy0 to experimental. As
> this version introduces a small change that has a big visual impact on
> the Debian boot, I would like to get some feedback on it be
On 04/04/2012 05:35 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Hi -devel (and -lsb),
>
> I have recently uploaded lsb-base 4.1+Debian0+fancy0 to experimental. As
> this version introduces a small change that has a big visual impact on
> the Debian boot, I would like to get some feedback on it before
> uploa
On Mié 04 Abr 2012 06:35:49 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud escribió:
> Hi -devel (and -lsb),
>
> I have recently uploaded lsb-base 4.1+Debian0+fancy0 to experimental. As
> this version introduces a small change that has a big visual impact on
> the Debian boot, I would like to get some feedback on it before
On Jul 22, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a couple of initscripts that print progress messages and I do
> not want to be too hasty in eliminating them so I am thinking of
> doing the following for now:
Please don't. lsb-base is a tiny package, either use it or don't.
It will have
Le Ven 22 Juillet 2005 11:14, Thomas Hood a écrit :
> I have a couple of initscripts that print progress messages and I do
> not want to be too hasty in eliminating them so I am thinking of
> doing the following for now:
>
> ...
>
> if [ -r /lib/lsb/init-functions ] ; then
> . /lib/lsb/init-f
I have a couple of initscripts that print progress messages and I do
not want to be too hasty in eliminating them so I am thinking of
doing the following for now:
...
if [ -r /lib/lsb/init-functions ] ; then
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
print_warning_msg() { log_warning_msg "$*" ; }
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:30:33AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Anyway, I like the pretty colours. It makes it very easy to see if
Colours aside, having the last six-or-so characters dedicated to a
PASS/FAIL style string makes summing up the boot process at a glance
much easier, and mak
* Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050719 09:30]:
> Anyway, I like the pretty colours. It makes it very easy to see if
> something is wrong during boot or service startup with just a glance.
That's one of the reasons I dislike colours. Having other peoples
system display fatal error me
The lsb functions currently only support this:
Doing something...[ ok ]
They don't support:
Doing something...doing something else... [ ok ]
or
Doing something...warning: no foo... [ ok ]
For this a log_progress_msg(
* Stig Sandbeck Mathisen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050719 09:31]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It would be better if there would be some configureable option in
> > lsb-base.
> ,
> | Angry Fruit Salad?
> |
> | [yes] [no]
> `
configuration option like in "set style = plain"
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be better if there would be some configureable option in
> lsb-base.
,
| Angry Fruit Salad?
|
| [yes] [no]
`
Anyway, I like the pretty colours. It makes it very easy to see if
something is wrong during boot or service startup with ju
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050718 20:17]:
> On Jul 18, "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to configure this to not create masses of processes and
> > confusing the user with colors?
> You can write your own package which conflicts+provides lsb-base and
> im
On Jul 18, "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to configure this to not create masses of processes and
> confusing the user with colors?
You can write your own package which conflicts+provides lsb-base and
implements /lib/lsb/init-functions.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050717 18:50]:
> I am considering switching the init scripts of my packages to lsb-base
> (which means that it will have to be promoted to important priority, at
> least).
> If anybody has objections please voice them now.
Is there a way to configure this to not
On Jul 17, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already did this for discover1, but did this in a way to make it use
> lsb-base only if it is installed.
I can't see the point. The package is tiny, so if it should be used then
everybody should install it.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.
[Thomas Hood]
> The package is only 20 kbytes installed. Let's just start Depending on it.
I agree. We should start using the LSB, not just talk about trying to
be LSB conforming. :)
But I made the use optional for discover1 because someone complained
and said it was just a fancy way to get col
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:33:40 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I used this code to make lsb-base optional, and used the lsb functions
> for output:
>
> if [ -f /lib/lsb/init-functions ]; then
> . /lib/lsb/init-functions
> else
> log_begin_msg() { echo "$@"; }
> log_success_msg(
[Marco d'Itri]
> I am considering switching the init scripts of my packages to
> lsb-base (which means that it will have to be promoted to important
> priority, at least).
> If anybody has objections please voice them now.
I already did this for discover1, but did this in a way to make it use
lsb-
18 matches
Mail list logo
