Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>> libavcodec had several vulnerabilities and without doubt it'll have more in
>> the next 30 months after Etch release. So it's absolutely necessary to
>> link dynamically. (Many do already, e.g. xine-lib).
>> I'll file RC bugs for any packages still embedding or link static
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> libavcodec had several vulnerabilities and without doubt it'll have more in
>> the next 30 months after Etch release. So it's absolutely necessary to
>> link dynamically. (Many do already, e.g. xine-lib).
>> I'll file RC bugs for any packages still embedding or link stati
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libavcodec had several vulnerabilities and without doubt it'll have more in
> the next 30 months after Etch release. So it's absolutely necessary to
> link dynamically. (Many do already, e.g. xine-lib).
> I'll file RC bugs for any packages still emb
Am Donnerstag 05 Oktober 2006 18:01 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> libavcodec had several vulnerabilities and without doubt it'll have more in
> the next 30 months after Etch release. So it's absolutely necessary to
> link dynamically. (Many do already, e.g. xine-lib).
> I'll file RC bugs for any pa
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> since I often see that packages keep local copies of libs and use those, I=
>=20
> kind of want to object to arguments for such build behaviour.
>
> The latest one I found is xmms-wma: it uses a local stripped-down copy of=20
> ffmpeg's libavcodec and libavformat.
>
> The g
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> If there's ever been a security update for the library, or it's likely
> that a buffer overflow or similar would have security implications, then
> I think it's definitely more than just wishlist. For example, it's a
> pain to patch all those (subtly di
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some, the reason is acceptable, for some it isn't? So what makes it
> candidate for a bug report with a severity greater than wishlist?
> What is the main opinion among Debian maintainers?
If there's ever been a security update for the library, or
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since I often see that packages keep local copies of libs and use those, I
> kind of want to object to arguments for such build behaviour.
>
> The latest one I found is xmms-wma: it uses a local stripped-down copy of
> f
Am Donnerstag 05 Oktober 2006 16:10 schrieb Mikhail Gusarov:
> You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> HS> since I often see that packages keep local copies of libs and use
> HS> those, I kind of want to object to arguments for such build
> HS> behaviour.
>
> Do you mean debian packages or upstream o
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
HS> since I often see that packages keep local copies of libs and use
HS> those, I kind of want to object to arguments for such build
HS> behaviour.
Do you mean debian packages or upstream ones?
--
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
10 matches
Mail list logo
