Re: libtool & rpath

1999-01-30 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 11:39:27PM -0800, Jim Pick wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > A package I maintain uses libtool. To remove the rpath stuff, I > > apply this patch to configure.in. > > Actually, I sort of like the following technique better: [...] > That way, there

Re: libtool & rpath

1999-01-30 Thread Jim Pick
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A package I maintain uses libtool. To remove the rpath stuff, I > apply this patch to configure.in. Actually, I sort of like the following technique better: Add the following to debian/rules right before calling "$(MAKE) all" (but after configure):

Re: libtool & rpath

1999-01-28 Thread James Troup
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:29:42PM +, James Troup wrote: > > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > +case ${host} in > > > + *-pc-linux-gnu) > >^^ > > > > s/pc/*/ (pc==non-i386 unfriendly) > > Good point. However, /usr/doc/

Re: libtool & rpath

1999-01-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:29:42PM +, James Troup wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > +case ${host} in > > + *-pc-linux-gnu) >^^ > > s/pc/*/ (pc==non-i386 unfriendly) Good point. However, /usr/doc/lintian/libtool-workarounds.txt suggestions the above, which is

Re: libtool & rpath

1999-01-27 Thread James Troup
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > +case ${host} in > + *-pc-linux-gnu) ^^ s/pc/*/ (pc==non-i386 unfriendly) -- James "Never trust trucks"

Re: libtool & rpath

1999-01-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 02:51:03PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > an easy fix for that? Splitting the packages is a possibility, but > > libgeda is of absolutely no use on its own yet, and I don't think there > > is anything for a libgeda-dev. > > I ha

Re: libtool & rpath

1999-01-26 Thread Martin Mitchell
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > an easy fix for that? Splitting the packages is a possibility, but > > libgeda is of absolutely no use on its own yet, and I don't think there > > is anything for a libgeda-dev. > > I have found this in

Re: libtool & rpath

1999-01-26 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > A package I maintain uses libtool. To remove the rpath stuff, I > apply this patch to configure.in. Now lintian tells me that the executables > have rpath set too! Is there an easy way to fix that? > > Also, because this package (geda) includes a libr