On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:53:55AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Steve Langasek, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 12:43:56 -0700, a écrit :
> > Um, no, build-depending on virtual packages is absolutely allowed.
>
> Yes, but something has to make the buildd pick up one package which
> provides it. It won't de
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 01:50:16AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Russ Allbery, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 17:12:49 -0700, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault writes:
> > > Steve Langasek, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 12:43:56 -0700, a écrit :
> > >> Um, no, build-depending on virtual packages is absolutely allowed.
>
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Russ Allbery, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 17:12:49 -0700, a écrit :
>> Only if there is more than one package providing the same virtual
>> package. If there is only one, the buildds will pick that one.
> I don't think so.
See how libjpeg-dev has been handled for some time.
>
Russ Allbery, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 17:12:49 -0700, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault writes:
> > Steve Langasek, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 12:43:56 -0700, a écrit :
>
> >> Um, no, build-depending on virtual packages is absolutely allowed.
>
> > Yes, but something has to make the buildd pick up one package whic
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Steve Langasek, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 12:43:56 -0700, a écrit :
>> Um, no, build-depending on virtual packages is absolutely allowed.
> Yes, but something has to make the buildd pick up one package which
> provides it. It won't decide by itself which one to choose.
Only
Steve Langasek, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 12:43:56 -0700, a écrit :
> Um, no, build-depending on virtual packages is absolutely allowed.
Yes, but something has to make the buildd pick up one package which
provides it. It won't decide by itself which one to choose.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:11:10PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The following packages have been in BD-Uninstallable buildd state for a
> very long time. This is because they build-depend on the libphobos-dev
> virtual package instead of an actual package such as libphobos-4.4-dev
> or libphobos
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 14:40:20 +0100, Peter De Wachter wrote:
> On 22-03-14 13:11, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The following packages have been in BD-Uninstallable buildd state for a
> > very long time. This is because they build-depend on the libphobos-dev
> > virtual package inst
Peter De Wachter, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 14:40:20 +0100, a écrit :
> GDC is build on all architectures but Phobos
> currently only works on x86. (I believe ARM support is coming soon.)
Would it also work on x86 kfreebsd & hurd?
> All these packages have:
> Depends: gdc, libphobos-dev
>
> This wo
On 22-03-14 13:11, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following packages have been in BD-Uninstallable buildd state for a
> very long time. This is because they build-depend on the libphobos-dev
> virtual package instead of an actual package such as libphobos-4.4-dev
> or libphobos-4.8-dev.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo