Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 17 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat spake thusly:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> A copy and paste from the NEW file is certainly useless.
>
> If the NEW file provides information relevant to an end user
> reading
On 17 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat spake thusly:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 16 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat uttered the following:
>>
>>> Here is the relevant policy :
>>>
>>> , | Changes in the Debian version of the package should be
>>> briefly explained in the D
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 16 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat uttered the following:
>
>> Here is the relevant policy :
>>
>> , | Changes in the Debian version of the package should be
>> briefly explained in the Debian changelog file
>> `debian/changelog'.[1] This includ
On 16 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat uttered the following:
> Here is the relevant policy :
>
> , | Changes in the Debian version of the package should be
> briefly explained in the Debian changelog file
> `debian/changelog'.[1] This includes modifications made in the
> Debian package compared
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:22:14PM +0300, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > * Christian Marillat:
> > >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
>
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > * Christian Marillat:
>> >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> Where are you reading that ?
>> >
>> > An
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Christian Marillat:
> >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Where are you reading that ?
> >
> > An upstream change is a change to the Debian package, to
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Christian Marillat:
>
>> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Where are you reading that ?
>
> An upstream change is a change to the Debian package, too, and listing
> them is expressly allowed under the "other changes" option.
I'm s
* Russ Allbery:
> Accordingly, for my packages, I mention (as sub-bullets to the "* New
> upstream release" bullet) any upstream change that:
>
> * Closes a Debian bug (and include the bug closer).
>
> * Is a major feature enhancement or a major bug fix likely to be of
>interest to a substan
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: libgtk2.0-0
> Version: 2.8.17-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 4.4
> Hi,
> Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the
> second time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package
> isn't a
* Christian Marillat:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * Christian Marillat:
>>
>>> Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
>>> time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
>>> native package the upstream changelog shou
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Christian Marillat:
>
>> Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
>> time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
>> native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
>
> Accoridng t
* Christian Marillat:
> Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
> time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
> native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
Accoridng to Policy section 4.4, it's okay to list "other change
13 matches
Mail list logo
